학술논문

Diagnosis of and treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis: an updated review.
Document Type
Article
Source
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Nov2012, Vol. 126 Issue 5, p293-305. 13p.
Subject
*ANGIOPLASTY
*ENDARTERECTOMY
*STROKE
*DISEASE relapse
*REVASCULARIZATION (Surgery)
*PLATELET aggregation inhibitors
*THERAPEUTICS
CAROTID artery stenosis
Language
ISSN
0001-6314
Abstract
Carotid stenoses of ≥50% account for about 15-20% of strokes. Their degree may be moderate (50-69%) or severe (70-99%). Current diagnostic methods include ultrasound, MR- or CT-angiography. Stenosis severity, irregular plaque surface, and presence of microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler predict the early recurrence risk, which may be as high as 20%. Initial therapy comprises antiplatelets and statins. Benefit of revascularization is greater in men, in older patients, and in severe stenosis; patients with moderate stenoses may also profit particularly if the plaque has an irregular aspect. An intervention should be performed within <2 weeks. In large randomized studies comparing endarterectomy and stenting, endovascular therapy was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural stroke, yet in some studies, with a lower risk of myocardial infarction and of cranial neuropathy. These trials support endarterectomy as the first choice treatment. Risk factors for each of the two therapies have been indentified: coronary artery disease, neck radiation, contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy for endarterectomy, and, elderly patients (>70 years), arch vessel tortuosity and plaques with low echogenicity on ultrasound for carotid stenting. Lastly, in direct comparisons, a contralateral occlusion increases the risk of periprocedural complications in both types of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]