학술논문

Delivery catheter system carries more physiological right ventricular septal pacing than stylet system.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Apr2024, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p802-810. 9p.
Subject
*RESEARCH funding
*COMPUTED tomography
*ARTIFICIAL implants
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY
*MEMBRANE potential
*CATHETERS
*CARDIAC pacing
*RIGHT heart ventricle
*COMPARATIVE studies
*VENTRICULAR septum
*ELECTRODES
Language
ISSN
1045-3873
Abstract
Introduction: The Mt. FUJI multicenter trial demonstrated that a delivery catheter system had a higher rate of successful right ventricular (RV) lead deployment on the RV septum (RVS) than a conventional stylet system. In this subanalysis of the Mt. FUJI trial, we assessed the differences in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters during RV pacing between a delivery catheter system and a stylet system and their associations with the lead tip positions. Methods: Among 70 patients enrolled in the Mt FUJI trial, ECG parameters, RV lead tip positions, and lead depth inside the septum assessed by computed tomography were compared between the catheter group (n = 36) and stylet group (n = 34). Results: The paced QRS duration (QRS‐d), corrected paced QT (QTc), and JT interval (JTc) were significantly shorter in the catheter group than in the stylet group (QRS‐d: 130 ± 19 vs. 142 ± 15 ms, p =.004; QTc: 476 ± 25 vs. 514 ± 20 ms, p <.001; JTc: 347 ± 24 vs. 372 ± 17 ms, p <.001). This superiority of the catheter group was maintained in a subgroup analysis of patients with an RV lead tip position at the septum. The lead depth inside the septum was greater in the catheter group than in the stylet group, and there was a significant negative correlation between the paced QRS‐d and the lead depth. Conclusion: Using a delivery catheter system carries more physiological depolarization and repolarization during RVS pacing and deeper screw penetration in the septum in comparison to conventional stylet system. The lead depth could have a more impact on the ECG parameters rather than the type of pacing lead. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]