학술논문

Feasible Peer-Mediated Intervention for Autistic Children Using Minimal Speech: A Qualitative Intervention Development Process.
Document Type
Article
Source
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. May2024, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p1337-1355. 19p.
Subject
*TREATMENT of autism
*SPEECH therapy
*EARLY medical intervention
*QUALITATIVE research
*HUMAN services programs
*AFFINITY groups
*SPEECH therapy education
*PILOT projects
*JUDGMENT sampling
*ADULT education workshops
*STAKEHOLDER analysis
*CHILDREN
Language
ISSN
1058-0360
Abstract
Purpose: Qualitative engagement with stakeholders in the development of interventions can provide insight into strategies to maximize feasibility in real-life settings. We engaged stakeholders (autistic adults, early childhood educators, early childhood sector leaders and policy influencers, parents of autistic children, and speech-language pathologists) to inform the development of an educator-led peer-mediated intervention (PMI) for autistic preschoolers who use minimal speech that is feasible to implement in inclusive early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. Method: A qualitative iterative intervention design process was utilized. Stakeholders (N = 15) attended an online workshop and completed a document review exploring the acceptability and feasibility of the proposed embedded PMI. A two-step analysis procedure using the Theoretical Domains Framework and template analysis was conducted to identify the barriers, enablers, and supports to the implementation of embedded PMI in early childhood settings. Results: While embedded PMI was unanimously acceptable to stakeholders, several participants expressed concerns regarding feasibility. Barriers to the successful integration and implementation of PMI in inclusive preschool contexts included access to skills, knowledge, and resources. Participants identified strategies to overcome modifiable barriers and to enhance the existing enablers. These strategies are reflected in the following themes: build on the familiar, build capacity in augmentative and alternative communication, adopt a whole center approach, adapt to meet the needs of the ECEC setting, and engage in proactive implementation. Conclusion: To address barriers to the implementation of embedded PMI, action is needed at various levels: macro (national/policy), meso (organization/ setting), and micro (individual). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]