학술논문

What professors do in peer review: Interrogating assessment practices in the recruitment of professors in Sweden.
Document Type
Article
Source
Gender, Work & Organization. Nov2020, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p1361-1377. 17p.
Subject
*COLLEGE teachers
*MEETING minutes
*GENDER inequality
Language
ISSN
0968-6673
Abstract
Sweden is known for its political will to gender equality. Sweden is also a country with a strong tradition of transparency in university recruitments. In this article, the assessment practices in the appointment of full professors in one Swedish university are investigated from an intersectional and postcolonial perspective on gender and place/space. Using a multimethod approach to investigate written evaluations of applicants, recruitment group meeting minutes and interviews with reviewers, the results show that there is great variation in how evaluation criteria are applied and filled with meaning. Moreover, in more than half of the appointment decisions the reviewers disagreed. The interview results show a structural bias operating towards researchers applying from non‐Western university contexts. At an aggregated level, national applicants have 3.88 times greater chance to be proposed for a position and national women applicants are the most likely to be proposed for the position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]