학술논문

Biomarker-based risk prediction in the community.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
European Journal of Heart Failure. Nov2016, Vol. 18 Issue 11, p1342-1350. 9p. 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject
*BIOMARKERS
*RISK assessment
*CARDIOVASCULAR disease treatment
*NATRIURETIC peptides
*HEART failure
*PREVENTION
*ATRIAL fibrillation
*C-reactive protein
*CARDIOVASCULAR diseases
*LONGITUDINAL method
*MYOCARDIAL infarction
*PEPTIDE hormones
*PEPTIDES
*PROTEINS
*PULMONARY embolism
*RESEARCH funding
*STROKE
*TRANSIENT ischemic attack
*INDEPENDENT living
*PROPORTIONAL hazards models
*TROPONIN
CARDIOVASCULAR disease related mortality
Language
ISSN
1388-9842
Abstract
Aims: Guided by predictive characteristics of cardiovascular biomarkers, we explored the clinical implications of a simulated biomarker-guided heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) prevention strategy in the community.Methods and Results: In a community cohort (n = 1824), the predictive characteristics for HF and MACE of galectin-3 (Gal-3), ST2, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were established. We performed number needed to screen (NNS) and treat (NNT) with the intervention analyses according to biomarker screening strategy and intervention efficacy in persons with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. In the entire cohort, for both HF and MACE, the predictive characteristics of NT-proBNP and hscTnI were superior to other biomarkers; alone, in a multimarker model, and adjusting for clinical risk factors. An NT-proBNP-guided preventative intervention with an intervention effect size (4-year hazard ratio for intervention in biomarker positive cohort) of ≤0.7 would reduce the global burden of HF by ≥20% and MACE by ≥15%. From this simulation, the NNS to prevent one HF event or MACE in 4 years would be ≤100 with a NNT to prevent one HF event of ≤20 and one MACE of ≤10.Conclusions: The predictive characteristics of NT-proBNP and hscTnI for HF or MACE in the community are superior to other biomarkers. Biomarker-guided preventative interventions with reasonable efficacy would compare favourably to established preventative interventions. This data provides a framework for biomarker selection which may inform design of biomarker-guided preventative intervention trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]