학술논문

A multiple case study of pre-diabetes care undertaken by general practice in Aotearoa/New Zealand: de-incentivised and de-prioritised work.
Document Type
Article
Source
BMC Primary Care. 4/29/2023, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Subject
*HEALTH services accessibility
*SOCIAL determinants of health
*FAMILY medicine
*TYPE 2 diabetes
*QUALITATIVE research
*CASE studies
*RESEARCH funding
*HEALTH equity
*METROPOLITAN areas
*THEMATIC analysis
*PREDIABETIC state
*HEALTH promotion
Language
ISSN
2731-4553
Abstract
Background: In Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ) general practices diagnose and manage pre-diabetes. This work is important as it has the potential to delay or prevent the onset of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), reduce NZ's health inequities, and the burden that T2DM places on health care services. However, no study has previously examined how this work routinely occurs in NZ. Methods: Two case studies of practices serving ethnically and socio-economically diverse populations, followed by cross-case analysis. Results: The NZ health care context including funding mechanisms, reporting targets, and the disease centred focus of care, acted together to dis-incentivise and de-prioritise pre-diabetes care in general practices. The social determinants of health differentially influenced patients' ability to engage with and respond to pre-diabetes care, significantly impacting this work. Differing perspectives about the significance of pre-diabetes and gaps in systematic screening practices were identified. Interventions used were inconsistent and lacked comprehensive ongoing support. Conclusions: Complex multi-layered factors impact on pre-diabetes care, and many of the barriers cannot be addressed at the general practice level. The practice serving the most disadvantaged population who concurrently have higher rates of pre-diabetes/T2DM were more adversely affected by the barriers identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]