학술논문

Safety and Feasibility of ≤24-h Short-Stay Right Colectomies for Primary Colon Cancer.
Document Type
Article
Source
World Journal of Surgery. Sep2023, Vol. 47 Issue 9, p2267-2278. 12p.
Subject
*COLECTOMY
*COLON cancer
*LENGTH of stay in hospitals
*PATIENT selection
*CANCER patients
Language
ISSN
0364-2313
Abstract
Background: Hospital length of stay (LOS) has been used as a surgical quality metric. This study seeks to determine the safety and feasibility of right colectomy as a ≤24-h short-stay procedure for colon cancer patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the ACS-NSQIP database and its Procedure Targeted Colectomy database (2012–2020). Adult patients with colon cancer who underwent right colectomies were identified. Patients were categorized into LOS ≤1 day (≤24-h short-stay), LOS 2–4 days, LOS 5–6 days, and LOS ≥7 days groups. Primary outcomes were 30-day overall and serious morbidity. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, readmission, and anastomotic leak. The association between LOS and overall and serious morbidity was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: 19,401 adult patients were identified, with 371 patients (1.9%) undergoing short-stay right colectomies. Patients undergoing short-stay surgery were generally younger with fewer comorbidities. Overall morbidity for the short-stay group was 6.5%, compared to 11.3%, 23.4%, and 42.0% for LOS 2–4 days, LOS 5–6 days, and LOS ≥7 days groups, respectively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in anastomotic leak, mortality, and readmission rates in the short-stay group compared to patients with LOS 2–4 days. Patients with LOS 2–4 days had increased odds of overall morbidity (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.10–2.65, p = 0.016) compared to patients with short-stay but no differences in odds of serious morbidity (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.61–2.36, p = 0.590). Conclusions: ≤24-h short-stay right colectomy is safe and feasible for a highly-select group of colon cancer patients. Optimizing patients preoperatively and implementing targeted readmission prevention strategies may aid patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]