학술논문
Factors Influencing Maintenance of Alignment and Functional Improvement Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 3-Year Outcome Analysis.
Document Type
Article
Author
Passias, Peter G.; Passfall, Lara; Moattari, Kevin; Krol, Oscar; Kummer, Nicholas A.; Tretiakov, Peter; Williamson, Tyler; Joujon-Roche, Rachel; Imbo, Bailey; Janjua, Muhammad Burhan; Jankowski, Pawel; Paulino, Carl; Schwab, Frank J.; Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane; Singh, Vivek; Ahmad, Salman; Onafowokan, Tobi; Lebovic, Jordan; Tariq, Muhammad; Saleh, Hesham
Source
Subject
*SPINE abnormalities
*SPINAL surgery
*ADULTS
*MECHANICAL failures
*FUNCTIONAL status
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
0362-2436
Abstract
Study Design. This was a retrospective review. Objective. To assess the factors contributing to durability of surgical results following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background. Factors contributing to the long-term sustainability of ASD correction are currently undefined. Materials and Methods. Operative ASD patients with preoperatively (baseline) and 3-year postoperatively radiographic/healthrelated quality of life data were included. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, a favorable outcome was defined as meeting at least three of four criteria: (1) no proximal junctional failure or mechanical failure with reoperation, (2) best clinical outcome (BCO) for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) (≥4.5) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (<15), (3) improving in at least one SRS-Schwab modifier, and (4) not worsening in any SRS-Schwab modifier. A robust surgical result was defined as having a favorable outcome at both 1 and 3 years. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariable regression analysis with conditional inference tree for continuous variables. Results. We included 157 ASD patients in this analysis. At 1 year postoperatively, 62 patients (39.5%) met the BCO definition for ODI and 33 (21.0%) met the BCO for SRS. At 3 years, 58 patients (36.9%) had BCO for ODI and 29 (18.5%) for SRS. Ninety-five patients (60.5%) were identified as having a favorable outcome at 1 year postoperatively. At 3 years, 85 patients (54.1%) had a favorable outcome. Seventy-eight patients (49.7%) met criteria for a durable surgical result. Multivariable adjusted analysis identified the following independent predictors of surgical durability: surgical invasiveness >65, being fused to S1/pelvis, baseline to 6-week pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference >13.9°, and having a proportional Global Alignment and Proportion score at 6 weeks. Conclusions. Nearly 50% of the ASD cohort demonstrated good surgical durability, with favorable radiographic alignment and functional status maintained up to 3 years. Surgical durability was more likely in patients whose reconstruction was fused to the pelvis and addressed lumbopelvic mismatch with adequate surgical invasiveness to achieve full alignment correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]