학술논문

Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening CT After a Provider Order for Screening in the PROSPR-Lung Consortium.
Document Type
Article
Source
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine. Feb2024, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p186-194. 9p.
Subject
*EARLY detection of cancer
*CONSORTIA
*LUNG cancer
*RACE
*UNIVARIATE analysis
*MEDICAL screening
Language
ISSN
0884-8734
Abstract
Background: Uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) has been slow with less than 20% of eligible people who currently or formerly smoked reported to have undergone a screening CT. Objective: To determine individual-, health system-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with LCS uptake after a provider order for screening. Design and Subjects: We conducted an observational cohort study of screening-eligible patients within the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR)–Lung Consortium who received a radiology referral/order for a baseline low-dose screening CT (LDCT) from a healthcare provider between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Main Measures: The primary outcome is screening uptake, defined as LCS-LDCT completion within 90 days of the screening order date. Key Results: During the study period, 18,294 patients received their first order for LCS-LDCT. Orders more than doubled from the beginning to the end of the study period. Overall, 60% of patients completed screening after receiving their first LCS-LDCT order. Across health systems, uptake varied from 41 to 87%. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, older age, male sex, former smoking status, COPD, and receiving care in a centralized LCS program were positively associated with completing LCS-LDCT. Unknown insurance status, other or unknown race, and lower neighborhood socioeconomic status, as measured by the Yost Index, were negatively associated with screening uptake. Conclusions: Overall, 40% of patients referred for LCS did not complete a LDCT within 90 days, highlighting a substantial gap in the lung screening care pathway, particularly in decentralized screening programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]