학술논문

Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Jan2002, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p71-80. 10p.
Subject
*CYCLOSPORINE
*PHARMACOKINETICS
*KIDNEY transplant patients
*STATISTICS
*BIOAVAILABILITY
*CHAOS theory
*COMPARATIVE studies
*EMULSIONS
*GAS chromatography
*IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE agents
*KIDNEY transplantation
*MASS spectrometry
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL cooperation
*ORAL drug administration
*PROBABILITY theory
*RESEARCH
*EVALUATION research
*STATISTICAL models
Language
ISSN
0312-5963
Abstract
Objective: To develop a maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian estimator for the pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporin, based on only three timepoints, and evaluate its performance with respect to a full-profile nonlinear regression approach.Patients: 20 adult patients with stable renal transplants given orally administered microemulsified cyclosporin and mycophenolate.Methods: Cyclosporin was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nonlinear regression and MAP Bayesian estimation were performed using a home-made program and a previously designed pharmacokinetic model including an S-shaped absorption profile described by a gamma distribution.Outcome Measures and Results: MAP Bayesian estimation using the best limited sampling strategy (before administration, and 1 and 3 hours after administration) was compared with nonlinear regression (taken as the reference method) for the prediction of the different pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices. Median relative prediction error was -0.49 and -3.42% for area under the concentration-time curve over the administration interval of 12 hours (AUC12) and estimated peak drug concentration (Cmax), respectively (nonsignificant). Relative precision was 2.00 and 4.32%, and correlation coefficient (r) was 0.985 and 0.955, for AUC12 and Cmax, respectively.Conclusion: This paper reports preliminary results in a stable renal transplant patient population, showing that MAP Bayesian estimation can allow accurate prediction of AUC12 and Cmax with only three samples (0, 1 and 3 hours). Although these results require confirmation by further studies in other clinical settings, using other drug combinations, other analytical methods and commercially available pharmacokinetic software, the method seems promising as a tool for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin in clinical practice or for exposure-controlled studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]