학술논문

Screening Results for Diabetic Retinopathy in Germany in a Real-world Cohort in a Metropolitan Diabetes Care Center.
Document Type
Article
Source
Experimental & Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes. Apr2023, Vol. 131 Issue 4, p182-186. 5p.
Subject
*MEDICAL screening
*DIABETIC retinopathy
*TYPE 2 diabetes
*VISION testing
*GENERAL practitioners
*POTENTIAL barrier
*OPHTHALMOLOGY practice
Language
ISSN
0947-7349
Abstract
Background Retinal screening is mandatory to prevent vision loss and blindness due to diabetic retinopathy (DR). The aim of the study was to determine retinopathy screening rates and potential barriers in a German metropolitan diabetes care center. Methods Between May and October 2019, 265 patients with diabetes mellitus (95% type 2 diabetes; age 62±13.2 years; diabetes duration 11.1±8.5 years, HbA1c 7.4±1.0%) were referred to an ophthalmologist (referral form with order "Fundoscopy in diabetes mellitus, findings requested," completed documentation form "General practitioner's/diabetologist's report to the ophthalmologist" and prepared documentation form "Ophthalmologist's report"). A structured interview was used to assess the level of compliance with the guidelines and to identify potential barriers to retinopathy screening in a real-world setting, including the quantification of extra payments. Results All patients were interviewed at 7.9±2.5 months after the referral for retinopathy screening had been issued. According to patient reporting, fundoscopy was performed in 191 (75%) patients. Ophthalmological reports were obtained from 119/191 (62%) patients (46% of the entire cohort). 10/119 (8%) patients had been previously diagnosed with DR and 6/119 (5%) with new-onset DR. In 158/191 (83%) of patients, the referral had been accepted by the ophthalmology practice, of which 25,1% made a co-payment of 36.2±37.6 €. Discussion Despite a high screening performance in a real-world setting, complete screening in compliance with German guidelines, including written reporting, was found in less than half of the cohort. The prevalence and incidence of DR are high. Even when referred according to the regulations, one-quarter of patients made a co-payment. Efficient solutions to current barriers can emerge with mutual time-saving information prior to examination and feedback about the implementation of findings into treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]