학술논문

Intervention to reduce perceived loneliness in community‐dwelling older people.
Document Type
Article
Source
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Jun2021, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p366-374. 9p. 3 Charts.
Subject
*PREVENTION of mental depression
*MINDFULNESS
*SOCIAL support
*EVALUATION of human services programs
*YOGA
*SOCIAL workers
*MENTAL health
*COGNITION
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*SOCIAL isolation
*T-test (Statistics)
*PSYCHOLOGICAL tests
*INDEPENDENT living
*LONELINESS
*QUALITY of life
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*WALKING
*PUBLIC spaces
*RESEARCH funding
*STATISTICAL sampling
*METROPOLITAN areas
*PATIENT education
*STATISTICAL correlation
*DATA analysis software
*BARTHEL Index
*ADULT education workshops
*COMMUNITY health nursing
*OLD age
Language
ISSN
0283-9318
Abstract
Aim: We evaluated the reduction in perceived loneliness and depression and the increase in social support and quality of life in community‐dwelling lonely people aged >65 years included in a community intervention compared with nonlonely controls from the same urban area. Design: Randomised clinical trial without blind evaluation. Location: Urban area of Barcelona. Participants: Community dwellers aged >65 years with loneliness identified by the primary care team. Interventions: The primary care team together with community agents (municipal social services, community civil and religious associations) carried out 18 sessions developing activities including educational workshops, mindfulness, yoga, walking and visits to urban gardens. Results: We included 55 patients (87% female, mean age 80.6 ± 6.86 years) of whom 82% had moderate and 18% severe loneliness. Six months postintervention, 48.3% of the intervention group did not feel lonely compared with 26.9% of controls (p = 0.001). Social support (DUKE‐UNC‐11) increased from 33.5 ± 9.3 to 41.4 ± 6.6, and mental health (SF‐12) from 36 ± 610.4 to 48 ± 11.1 and depressive symptoms (Yesavage test) decreased from 9.2 ± 3.6 to 5.2 ± 5.0 in the intervention but not the control group. Conclusions: The intervention mainly reached people with moderate loneliness and significantly improved the perception of loneliness, depressive symptoms, social support and the mental health component of the quality of life. The intervention may be more suitable for people with moderate loneliness, but these types of activities may be difficult to accept by people with severe loneliness not related to the barriers to socialisation generated by ageing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]