학술논문

A diagnostic dilemma: chronic sinusitis diagnosed by non-otolaryngologists.
Document Type
Article
Source
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. May2016, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p486-490. 5p.
Subject
*SINUSITIS
*PARANASAL sinus diseases
*DIAGNOSIS
*EVIDENCE-based medicine
*COMPUTED tomography
*ENDOSCOPY
Language
ISSN
2042-6976
Abstract
Background Ambulatory care visits for chronic sinusitis outnumber visits for acute sinusitis. The majority of these visits are with non-otolaryngologists. In order to better understand patients diagnosed with chronic sinusitis by non-otolaryngologists, we sought to determine if incident cases of chronic sinusitis diagnosed by primary care (PC) or emergency medicine (EM) providers meet diagnostic criteria. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients were identified using administrative data from 2005 to 2006. The dataset was then clinically annotated based on chart review. We excluded prevalent cases. Results We identified 114 patients with newly diagnosed chronic sinusitis in EM (75) or PC settings (39). Rhinorrhea (EM 61%, PC 59%) and nasal obstruction (EM 67%, PC 64%) were common in both settings but facial fullness (EM 80%, PC 39%) and pain (EM 40%, PC 18%) were more common in the EM setting. Few patients reported symptoms of 90 days or longer (EM 6.0%, PC 24%) and no patient had evidence of inflammation on physical examination. A minority of patients received a sinus computed tomography (CT) scan (22.8%) or nasal endoscopy (1.8%). In total, only 1 patient diagnosed with chronic sinusitis met the diagnostic criteria. Conclusion Most patients diagnosed with chronic sinusitis by non-otolaryngologists do not have the condition. Caution should be used in studying chronic sinusitis using administrative data from non-otolaryngology providers because a large proportion of the patients may not actually have the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]