학술논문

Care-giver wellbeing: exploring gender, relationship-to-care-recipient and care-giving demands in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.
Document Type
Article
Source
Ageing & Society. Nov2023, Vol. 43 Issue 11, p2517-2553. 37p.
Subject
*WELL-being
*CAREGIVER attitudes
*SERVICES for caregivers
*SOCIAL support
*BURDEN of care
*SATISFACTION
*HEALTH status indicators
*REGRESSION analysis
*SEX distribution
*SPOUSES
*COMPARATIVE studies
*SOCIOECONOMIC factors
*AGING
*PSYCHOLOGY of caregivers
*MENTAL depression
*INTERSECTIONALITY
*RESEARCH funding
*FAMILY relations
*LONGITUDINAL method
Language
ISSN
0144-686X
Abstract
The three-way intersection of gender, relationship-to-care-recipient and care-giving demands has not, to our knowledge, been examined in relation to the wellbeing of family care-givers. We explore inequalities in depressive symptoms and life satisfaction, comparing wives, husbands, daughters and sons providing very-intensive care (36+ hours/week) with those providing less care and disparities between these groups in the factors related to disadvantage. Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (N = 5,994) support the existence of differences between the groups. Very-intensive care-giving wives report the most depressive symptoms and lowest life satisfaction; less-intensive care-giving sons report the fewest depressive symptoms, and less-intensive care-giving daughters report the highest life satisfaction. However, group differences in life satisfaction disappear among very-intensive care-givers. Drawing on Intersectionality and Stress Process theories, data from regression analyses reveal a non-significant gender–relationship–demand interaction term, but, health, socio-economic and social support resources play a strong mediating role between care demand and wellbeing. Analyses of the eight groups separately reveal diversity in the care-giving experience. Among less-intensive care-givers, the mediating role of resources remains strong even as differences are evident. Among very-intensive care-givers, the role of resources is less and differences in wellbeing between the groups are magnified. Policy implications emphasise the imperative to personalise services to meet the varied needs of care-givers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]