학술논문

Incorporating Functional Strength Integration Techniques During Total Hip Arthroplasty Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Document Type
Article
Source
PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. Mar2024, Vol. 104 Issue 3, p1-14. 14p.
Subject
*SELF-evaluation
*BIOMECHANICS
*TOTAL hip replacement
*RESEARCH funding
*SURGERY
*PATIENTS
*PATIENT safety
*FUNCTIONAL training
*FUNCTIONAL assessment
*STATISTICAL sampling
*BLIND experiment
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*ANALYSIS of covariance
*STRENGTH training
*MUSCLE strength
*CONTROL groups
*PRE-tests & post-tests
*QUALITY of life
*BODY movement
*DATA analysis software
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*REHABILITATION
Language
ISSN
1538-6724
Abstract
Objective Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common orthopedic procedure that alleviates pain for millions of individuals. Yet, persistent physical function deficits, perhaps associated with movement compensations, are observed after THA. These deficits negatively affect quality of life and health for many individuals. Functional strength integration (FSI) techniques combine muscle strength training with specific movement retraining to improve physical function. This study aimed to determine if FSI would improve functional performance through remediation of movement compensations for individuals after THA. Methods A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ninety-five participants were randomized to either the FSI or control (CON) group for an 8-week intervention. The FSI protocol included exercise to improve muscular control and stability around the hip to minimize movement compensation during daily activity. The CON protocol included low-load resistance exercise, range-of-motion activities, and patient education. Functional performance, muscle strength, and self-reported outcomes were measured preoperatively, midway and after intervention, and 6 months after THA. Change from preoperative assessment to each time point was measured, and between-group differences were assessed. Results There were minimal differences in outcomes between groups at the first postoperative assessment. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the later assessments, including the primary endpoint. Both groups improved functional outcomes throughout the study period. Conclusion The FSI intervention did not result in greater improvements in function after THA compared to the CON intervention. Future work should further investigate additional biomechanical outcomes, timing of the FSI protocol, effective dosing, and patient characteristics predictive of success with FSI. Impact Recovery after THA is complex, and individuals after THA are affected by persistent movement deficits that affect morbidity and quality of life. The present study suggests that either approach to THA rehabilitation could improve outcomes for patients, and that structured rehabilitation programs may benefit individuals after THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]