부산대학교 도서관

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of tele-ophthalmology (TO) versus face-to-face screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in diabetes care centers (DCC) across India. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of DR screening in individuals with diabetes performed across 35 branches of a chain of DCC in 20 cities in India over 1 year. In 30 DCC, DR screening was performed by TO, where retinal images obtained using Fundus on Phone camera were uploaded through the telemedicine network for centralized DR grading by eight retina specialists. In five DCC, DR screening was performed by fundus examination (FE) by the same retina specialists. The rate of detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR) (defined as the presence of proliferative DR and/or diabetic macular edema) through the two modes was compared. Results: A total of 58,612 individuals were screened for DR from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018: 25,316 by TO and 33,296 by FE. The mean age and mean duration of diabetes of the individuals with diabetes screened by TO was 55.8 ± 11.2 years and 9.5 ± 7.3 years; and in individuals screened by FE, it was 57.5 ± 11.6 years and 11.5 ± 8.0 years respectively. The mean glycated hemoglobin was 8.8% ± 2.1% and 8.5% ± 1.9% in the two groups, respectively. Any DR was detected in 31.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.0-32.3) by tele-screening and in 38.5% (95% CI: 37.9-39.0) by FE, whereas STDR was detected in 7.3% (95% CI: 7.0-7.7) by TO and in 10.5% (95% CI: 10.2-10.9) by FE. Overall, 11.4% individuals with diabetes in the TO group, including 4.1% with ungradable images, were advised referral to retina specialists for further management. Conclusion: Screening for DR at DCC using TO is feasible and effective for STDR detection in India and may be adopted throughout India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]