부산대학교 도서관

Background: Although primary care is a well suited context for conducting advance care planning (ACP), there are many barriers to initiating discussions regarding future health preference and end-of-life conversations. Methods: This qualitative study conducted 30 detailed individual interviews with senior administrators, medical and nurse practitioners of a local health district, NSW Ambulance, e-Health NSW, general practitioners and practice nurses to find out about barriers to ACP in South Western Sydney. Results: Thematic analysis was conducted on the interviews. Six major themes were identified: Prevalence; Empowerment of roles and responsibilities; Lack of training/knowledge/confidence; Fragmentation of care; Patient/family readiness; and Prognostication. Half of the participants were willing to use a prognostic tool to identify when a patient was likely to be at the end of their life and provide a prompt to initiate ACP. Conclusion: In addition to addressing training and acknowledging resource constraints, these findings suggest that if a prognostic tool was validated and practical in a primary care setting, it may provide valuable assistance to encourage everyone in society to begin discussing this issue and completing ACP. Previous research indicates that ACP can facilitate care consistent with the patient's attitudes, beliefs and priorities, and reduce the chance of people receiving non-beneficial or inappropriate care at the end-of-life. This study conducted detailed individual interviews with senior administrators, medical and nurse practitioners of a local health district, and general practitioners and practice nurses to understand the barriers to conducting advance care planning in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]