학술논문

PALLiative care in ONcology (PALLiON): A cluster-randomised trial investigating the effect of palliative care on the use of anticancer treatment at the end of life.
Document Type
Article
Source
Palliative Medicine. Feb2024, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p229-239. 11p.
Subject
*THERAPEUTIC use of antineoplastic agents
*CANCER patient psychology
*SPECIALTY hospitals
*CANCER chemotherapy
*TERMINALLY ill
*PATIENT-centered care
*HEALTH outcome assessment
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*COMPARATIVE studies
*CANCER treatment
*RESEARCH funding
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*QUALITY of life
*TUMORS
*DRUG utilization
*STATISTICAL sampling
*TERMINATION of treatment
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*DEATH
*PALLIATIVE treatment
*IMMUNOTHERAPY
*ONCOLOGISTS
*COMMUNICATION education
*PROPORTIONAL hazards models
*SYMPTOMS
Language
ISSN
0269-2163
Abstract
Background: Effects on anticancer therapy following the integration of palliative care and oncology are rarely investigated. Thus, its potential effect is unknown. Aim: To investigate the effects of the complex intervention PALLiON versus usual care on end-of-life anticancer therapy. Design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT01362816). The complex intervention consisted of a physician education program enhancing theoretical, clinical and communication skills, a patient-centred care pathway and patient symptom reporting prior to all consultations. Primary outcome was overall use, start and cessation of anticancer therapy in the last 3 months before death. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes. Mixed effects logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard were used. Setting: A total of 12 Norwegian hospitals (03/2017–02/2021). Participants: Patients ⩾18 years, advanced stage solid tumour, starting last line of anticancer therapy, estimated life expectancy ⩽12 months. Results: A total of 616 (93%) patients were included (intervention: 309/control:307); 63% males, median age 69, 77% had gastrointestinal cancers. Median survival time from inclusion was 8 (IQR 3–14) and 7 months (IQR 3–12), and days between anticancer therapy start and death were 204 (90–378) and 168 (69–351) (intervention/control). Overall, 78 patients (13%) received anticancer therapy in the last month (intervention: 33 [11%]/control: 45 [15%]). No differences were found in patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the probability of receiving end-of-life anticancer therapy. The intervention did not have the desired effect. It was probably too general and too focussed on communication skills to exert a substantial influence on conventional clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]