부산대학교 도서관

We herein describe two cases of de novo lymphoid blastic transformation in patients with no history of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), both of whom were labeled initially as Philadelphia positive B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). The first patient was an 18-year-old male who presented with subjective fever, intentional weight loss, generalized fatigue, and headache. Investigations showed leukocytosis (312 × 10^3/ul), thrombocytopenia and anemia. Flowcytometry was consistent with B-ALL, with aberrant expression of CD13 and CD33. He was found to be positive for BCR::ABL by FISH, and karyotype confirmed the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. He received a pediatric-inspired regimen and achieved remission with negative measurable residual disease (MRD) by flowcytometry, however with persistent cytogenetic abnormality using FISH for BCR::ABL. FISH abnormality was confirmed to be in the myeloid compartment using myeloid segregated FISH, reclassifying the disease to de novo lymphoid blastic phase CML. The second patient was a 52-year-old male who presented with fever and shortness of breath. Bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly were identified on examination, and investigations showed leukocytosis (371 × 10^3/ul), anemia, and thrombocytopenia. BCR::ABL rearrangement was identified by FISH, molecular testing, and confirmed with karyotype. He was treated with Mini-CVD and Ponatinib, achieved complete remission with negative MRD by flow cytometry, however molecular studies showed BCR-ABL1 level at 58% IS indicating a persistent cytogenetic abnormality. De novo lymphoid blastic-phase CML can therefore be difficult to differentiate from Philadelphia positive B-ALL due to their overlapping clinical and laboratory picture, implying the need to do myeloid compartment evaluation at the time of diagnosis. With recent progress in the treatment of Philadelphia positive B-ALL, including the role of transplant with the use of novel agents, a better characterization of this disease entity in retrospective and prospective trials is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]