학술논문

Comparison of characteristics, management and outcomes in hospital-onset and community-onset stroke: a multi-centre registry-based cohort study of acute stroke.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Neurological Sciences. Aug2022, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p4853-4862. 10p. 2 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subject
*STROKE treatment
*HOSPITALS
*RESEARCH
*STROKE
*RESEARCH methodology
*ATRIAL fibrillation
*ACQUISITION of data
*EVALUATION research
*COMPARATIVE studies
*LONGITUDINAL method
*DISEASE complications
Language
ISSN
1590-1874
Abstract
Objective: Hospital-onset stroke (HOS) is associated with poorer outcomes than community-onset stroke (COS). Previous studies have variably documented patient characteristics and outcome measures; here, we compare in detail characteristics, management and outcomes of HOS and COS.Methods: A total of 1656 men (mean age ± SD = 73.1 years ± 13.2) and 1653 women (79.3 years ± 13.0), with data prospectively collected (2014-2016) from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, were admitted with acute stroke in four UK hyperacute stroke units (HASU). Associations between variables were examined by chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression (COS as reference).Results: There were 272 HOS and 3037 COS patients with mean ages of 80.2 years ± 12.5 and 76.4 years ± SD13.5 and equal sex distribution. Compared to COS, HOS had higher proportions ≥ 80 years (64.0% vs 46.4%), congestive heart failure (16.9% vs 4.9%), atrial fibrillation (25.0% vs 19.7%) and pre-stroke disability (9.6% vs 5.1%), and similar history of stroke, hypertension, diabetes, stroke type and severity of stroke. After age, sex and co-morbidities adjustments, HOS had greater risk of pneumonia: OR (95%CI) = 1.9 (1.3-2.6); malnutrition: OR = 2.2 (1.7-2.9); immediate thrombolysis complications: OR = 5.3 (1.5-18.2); length of stay on HASU > 3 weeks: OR = 2.5 (1.8-3.4); post-stroke disability: OR = 1.8 (1.4-2.4); and in-hospital mortality: OR = 1.8 (1.2-2.4), as well as greater support at discharge including palliative care: OR = 1.9 (1.3-2.8); nursing care: OR = 2.0 (1.3-4.0), help for daily living activities: OR = 1.6 (1.1-2.2); and joint-care planning: OR = 1.5 (1.1-1.9).Conclusions: This detailed analysis of underlying differences in subject characteristics between patients with HOS or COS and adverse consequences provides further insights into understanding poorer outcomes associated with HOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]