학술논문

Health professions school applicant experiences of discrimination during interviews.
Document Type
Article
Source
Medical Teacher. May2023, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p532-541. 10p.
Subject
*School admission
*Health occupations schools
*Confidence intervals
*English language
*Discrimination (Sociology)
*Multiple regression analysis
*Interviewing
*Experience
*Socioeconomic status
*Students
*Chi-squared test
*Descriptive statistics
*Social classes
*Research bias
*Odds ratio
*Student attitudes
*Cisgender people
Language
ISSN
0142-159X
Abstract
Bias pervades every aspect of healthcare including admissions, perpetuating the lack of diversity in the healthcare workforce. Admissions interviews may be a time when applicants to health profession education programs experience discrimination. Between January and June 2021 we invited US and Canadian applicants to health profession education programs to complete a survey including the Everyday Discrimination Scale, adapted to ascertain experiences of discrimination during admissions interviews. We used chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between identity factors and positive responses. Of 1115 respondents, 281 (25.2%) reported discrimination in the interview process. Individuals with lower socioeconomic status (OR: 1.78, 95% CI [1.26, 2.52], p = 0.001) and non-native English speakers (OR: 1.76, 95% CI [1.08, 2.87], p = 0.02) were significantly more likely to experience discrimination. Half of those experiencing discrimination (139, or 49.6%) did nothing in response, though 44 (15.7%) reported the incident anonymously and 10 (3.6%) reported directly to the institution where it happened. Reports of discrimination are common among HPE applicants. Reforms at the interviewer- (e.g. avoiding questions about family planning) and institution-level (e.g. presenting institutional efforts to promote health equity) are needed to decrease the incidence and mitigate the impact of such events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]