학술논문

HbA1c changes in a deprived population who followed or not a diabetes self-management programme, organised in a multi-professional primary care practice: a historical cohort study on 207 patients between 2017 and 2019.
Document Type
Article
Source
BMC Endocrine Disorders. 5/20/2024, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*TREATMENT of diabetes
*DIABETES prevention
*GLYCOSYLATED hemoglobin
*SELF-management (Psychology)
*BODY mass index
*HYPERLIPIDEMIA
*ALBUMINURIA
*HEALTH status indicators
*PRIMARY health care
*DIABETIC retinopathy
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation
*LONGITUDINAL method
*HOSPITAL health promotion programs
*BLOOD pressure
*MEDICAL screening
*SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC factors
*HEALTH care teams
*COMORBIDITY
Language
ISSN
1472-6823
Abstract
Background: Diabetes self-management (DSM) helps people with diabetes to become actors in their disease. Deprived populations are particularly affected by diabetes and are less likely to have access to these programmes. DSM implementation in primary care, particularly in a multi-professional primary care practice (MPCP), is a valuable strategy to promote care access for these populations. In Rennes (Western France), a DSM programme was designed by a MPCP in a socio-economically deprived area. The study objective was to compare diabetes control in people who followed or not this DSM programme. Method: The historical cohort of patients who participated in the DSM programme at the MPCP between 2017 and 2019 (n = 69) was compared with patients who did not participate in the programme, matched on sex, age, diabetes type and place of the general practitioner's practice (n = 138). The primary outcome was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change between 12 months before and 12 months after the DSM programme. Secondary outcomes included modifications in diabetes treatment, body mass index, blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, presence of microalbuminuria, and diabetes retinopathy screening participation. Results: HbA1c was significantly improved in the exposed group after the programme (p < 0.01). The analysis did not find any significant between-group difference in socio-demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, and treatment adaptation. Conclusions: These results, consistent with the international literature, promote the development of DSM programmes in primary care settings in deprived areas. The results of this real-life study need to be confirmed on the long-term and in different contexts (rural area, healthcare organisation). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]