학술논문

Systematic Review and Psychometric Properties Analysis of First-, Middle-, and Top-Level Nurse Manager's Core Competencies Instruments.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Nursing Management. 4/27/2024, Vol. 2024, p1-15. 15p.
Subject
*NURSES
*NURSE administrators
*RESEARCH funding
*OCCUPATIONAL roles
*CINAHL database
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*LEADERSHIP
*NURSING
*SYSTEMATIC reviews
*MEDLINE
*CLINICAL competence
*PSYCHOMETRICS
*SPIRITUAL care (Medical care)
*NATIONAL competency-based educational tests
*ONLINE information services
*PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems
Language
ISSN
0966-0429
Abstract
Purpose. Healthcare organisations need to define the role of the nurse manager in light of recent global health developments. For this purpose, several core competencies essential for each hierarchical management level need to be assessed. Different measurement instruments have been developed to assess nurse managers' competencies. This systematic review summarises the characteristics and psychometric properties of existing instruments measuring first-, middle-, and top-level nurse managers' competencies. Methods. Following PRISMA guidelines for reporting and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines, 789 articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO databases with no time limitation. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023425854). Results. Ten tools were identified, assessing one or more competencies among nurse managers: Competency Elements for Nurse Managers of Tertiary General Hospitals, NICA-NL, HCCI, I-FLNMMCS, NMCI, Chase Nurse Manager Competency Questionnaire, CASHN, Questionnaire for Head Nurses' Managerial Competencies, Nurse Manager EBP Competency Scale, and the Home Healthcare Nurse Manager Assessment Tool. Conclusion. Following the COSMIN assessment, the Chase Nurse Manager Competency Instrument was the most comprehensive among the included instruments, and the CASHN questionnaire scored highest on methodological quality and level of evidence. These instruments can be used in clinical practice to evaluate competencies and as a basis for developing managerial training courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]