학술논문

Galaxy interactions are the dominant trigger for local type 2 quasars.
Document Type
Article
Source
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Jun2023, Vol. 522 Issue 2, p1736-1751. 16p.
Subject
*QUASARS
*GALAXY mergers
*ACTIVE galactic nuclei
*GALAXIES
*ACTIVE galaxies
*INSPECTION & review
Language
ISSN
0035-8711
Abstract
The triggering mechanism for the most luminous, quasar-like active galactic nuclei (AGN) remains a source of debate, with some studies favouring triggering via galaxy mergers, but others finding little evidence to support this mechanism. Here, we present deep Isaac Newton Telescope/Wide Field Camera imaging observations of a complete sample of 48 optically selected type 2 quasars – the QSOFEED sample (⁠|$L_{\rm [O\, \small {III}]}\gt 10^{8.5}\, \mathrm{L}_{\odot }$|⁠ ; z < 0.14). Based on visual inspection by eight classifiers, we find clear evidence that galaxy interactions are the dominant triggering mechanism for quasar activity in the local universe, with 65 |$^{+6}_{-7}$|  per cent of the type 2 quasar hosts showing morphological features consistent with galaxy mergers or encounters, compared with only 22 |$^{+5}_{-4}$|  per cent of a stellar-mass- and redshift-matched comparison sample of non-AGN galaxies – a 5σ difference. The type 2 quasar hosts are a factor of 3.0 |$^{+0.5}_{-0.8}$| more likely to be morphologically disturbed than their matched non-AGN counterparts, similar to our previous results for powerful 3CR radio AGN of comparable [O  iii ] emission-line luminosity and redshift. In contrast to the idea that quasars are triggered at the peaks of galaxy mergers as the two nuclei coalesce, and only become visible post-coalescence, the majority of morphologically disturbed type 2 quasar sources in our sample are observed in the pre-coalescence phase (61 |$^{+8}_{-9}$|  per cent). We argue that much of the apparent ambiguity that surrounds observational results in this field is a result of differences in the surface brightness depths of the observations, combined with the effects of cosmological surface brightness dimming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]