학술논문

How to Combat Over-Testing for Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review.
Document Type
Article
Source
Diagnostics (2075-4418). Apr2023, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p1326. 13p.
Subject
*PULMONARY embolism
*BREAST cancer
*DIAGNOSTIC imaging
*SYMPTOMS
*DIAGNOSTIC errors
*COMPUTED tomography
Language
ISSN
2075-4418
Abstract
The diagnosis of PE remains difficult in 2023 because the signs and symptoms are not sensible nor specific. The consequences of potential diagnostic errors can be dramatic, whether by default or by excess. Furthermore, the achievement of a simple diagnostic strategy, based on clinical probability assessment, D-dimer measurement and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) leads to a new challenge for PE diagnosis: over-testing. Indeed, since the 2000s, the wide availability of CTPA resulted in a major increase in investigations with a mod I confirm erate increase in PE diagnosis, without any notable improvement in patient outcomes. Quite the contrary, the complications of anticoagulation for PE increased significantly, and the long-term consequences of imaging diagnostic radiation is an important concern, especially the risk of breast cancer for young women. As a result, several strategies have been proposed to fight over-testing. They are mostly based on defining a subgroup of patients for whom no specific exam should be required to rule-out PE and adjusting the D-dimer cutoff to allow the exclusion of PE without performing CTPA. This narrative review presents the advantages and limitations of these different strategies as well as the perspective in PE diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]