학술논문

Quantifying the natural history of breast cancer.
Document Type
Article
Source
British Journal of Cancer. 10/15/2013, Vol. 109 Issue 8, p2035-2043. 9p.
Subject
*BREAST cancer
*MARKOV processes
*DUCTAL carcinoma
*BAYESIAN analysis
*CARCINOMA
Language
ISSN
0007-0920
Abstract
Background:Natural history models of breast cancer progression provide an opportunity to evaluate and identify optimal screening scenarios. This paper describes a detailed Markov model characterising breast cancer tumour progression.Methods:Breast cancer is modelled by a 13-state continuous-time Markov model. The model differentiates between indolent and aggressive ductal carcinomas in situ tumours, and aggressive tumours of different sizes. We compared such aggressive cancers, that is, which are non-indolent, to those which are non-growing and regressing. Model input parameters and structure were informed by the 1978-1984 Ostergotland county breast screening randomised controlled trial. Overlaid on the natural history model is the effect of screening on diagnosis. Parameters were estimated using Bayesian methods. Markov chain Monte Carlo integration was used to sample the resulting posterior distribution.Results:The breast cancer incidence rate in the Ostergotland population was 21 (95% CI: 17-25) per 10 000 woman-years. Accounting for length-biased sampling, an estimated 91% (95% CI: 85-97%) of breast cancers were aggressive. Larger tumours, 21-50 mm, had an average sojourn of 6 years (95% CI: 3-16 years), whereas aggressive ductal carcinomas in situ took around half a month (95% CI: 0-1 month) to progress to the invasive 10 mm state.Conclusion:These tumour progression rate estimates may facilitate future work analysing cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years for various screening strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]