학술논문

Thymectomy may not be associated with clinical improvement in MuSK myasthenia gravis.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Muscle & Nerve. Apr2019, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p404-410. 7p.
Subject
*THERAPEUTIC use of immunoglobulins
*MYASTHENIA gravis treatment
*CHOLINERGIC receptors
*AGE factors in disease
*THORACIC surgery
*COMPARATIVE studies
*LONGITUDINAL method
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL cooperation
*MYASTHENIA gravis
*PREDNISONE
*RESEARCH
*TRANSFERASES
*EVALUATION research
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
Language
ISSN
0148-639X
Abstract
Introduction: A randomized trial demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MG). Uncontrolled observational and histologic studies suggest thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)-MG.Methods: The therapeutic impact of thymectomy was evaluated from data collected for a multicenter, retrospective blinded review of rituximab in MuSK-MG.Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between thymectomy (n = 26) and nonthymectomy (n = 29) groups, including treatment with rituximab (42% vs. 45%). At last visit, 35% of thymectomy subjects reached the primary endpoint, a Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status (PIS) score of minimal manifestations (MM) or better, compared with 55% of controls (P = 0.17). After controlling for age at onset of MG, rituximab, prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin/plasma exchange treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome (odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.53, P = 0.19).Discussion: Thymectomy was not associated with additional clinical improvement in this multicenter cohort of MuSK-MG patients. Muscle Nerve 59:404-410, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]