학술논문

Left atrial structure and functional quantitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and multimodality tissue tracking: validation and reproducibility assessment.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (BioMed Central). Jul2015, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts, 6 Graphs.
Subject
*LEFT heart atrium
*CARDIAC output
*CARDIOVASCULAR system physiology
*STATISTICAL correlation
*HEART beat
*LONGITUDINAL method
*MAGNETIC resonance imaging
*MEDICAL cooperation
*SCIENTIFIC observation
*REGRESSION analysis
*RESEARCH
*RESEARCH funding
*STATISTICS
*T-test (Statistics)
*INTER-observer reliability
*DATA analysis software
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*PHYSIOLOGY
RESEARCH evaluation
Language
ISSN
1532-429X
Abstract
Background: Left atrium (LA) strain, volume and function are important markers of cardiovascular disease and myocardial impairment. We aimed to assess the accuracy of LA biplane volume and function measured by Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT). Also we assessed the inter-study reproducibility for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived LA volume and function parameters. Methods: Thirty subjects (mean age: 71.3 ±8.7, 87 % male) including twenty subjects with cardiovascular events and ten healthy subjects, with CMR were evaluated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). LA volumes were computed by the modified biplane method from 2- and 4-chamber projections and the Simpson's method from short-axis slices using both methods - manual and semi-automated delineation using MTT. LA total, active and passive ejection fractions were calculated. Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the measurements. In a second sample of 25 subjects (age: 65.7 ± 7.1, 72 % males) inter study, intra and inter reader reliability analysis was performed. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Results: Left atrial MTT structural and functional parameters were not different from manual delineation, yet image analysis was only half as time consuming on average with MTT. Maximal volume MTT was not different between the Simpson's and Biplane methods, functional parameters, however were different. MTT allowed us to measure multiple LA parameters with good-excellent (ICC; 0.88- 0.98, p < 0.001) intra-and inter reader reproducibility and fair-good (ICC; 0.44-0.82, p < 0.05-0.001) inter study reproducibility. Conclusions: MTT derived LA biplane volume and function is accurate and reproducible and is suited for use in longitudinal studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]