학술논문
Switching to an etravirine regimen in virologically suppressed patients with previous virological failures and presence of resistance mutations.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*ETRAVIRINE (Drug)
*ANTIRETROVIRAL agents
*NEVIRAPINE
*NUCLEOSIDE reverse transcriptase inhibitors
*VIROLOGY
*THERAPEUTICS
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1758-2652
Abstract
Background Simplification of antiretroviral therapy (ART) may be an option for virologically suppressed patients for a variety of reasons. Etravirine (ETV) 400 mg qd has a good safety profile and retains activity against viruses resistant to nevirapine or efavirenz. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of ETV plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as a simplification strategy in treatment-experienced virologically suppressed individuals with prior episodes of virological failure (VF) and presence of genotypic resistance mutations (GRM). Methods Eligible subjects were followed for ≥6 mo. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients remaining virologically suppressed using an ITT analysis. Genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) to new regimen was calculated according to Stanford resistance database. Results Fourteen (10%) of 145 subjects switching to ETV+2NRTIs while virologically suppressed had a documented prior VF and presence of GRM and were included in the analysis. Median (range) number of previous episodes of VF to ART, NRTI-containing regimen, to a NNRTI-containing regimen and to a PI-containing regimen were 4 (1-6), 2 (1-5), 1 (0-2) and 1 (0-2) respectively. Median duration of virological suppression before switching therapy was 22.5 months (1-65). All patients switched from an effective PI-containing regimen (8 LPV/r, 5 ATV/r and 1 DRV/r) to a qd regimen with ETV 400 mg plus Truvada® (n=12) or Kivexa® (2). 11/14 patients (79%) remained virologically suppressed at ≥6 mo. All of them had a GSS >1.5 to the new regimen and none had resistance to etravirine. Conversely 3/14 (21%) developed a VF at 1, 3 and 6 months respectively. All these 3 patients had a GSS ≤1.5 to the new regimen and 2 of them intermediate resistance to ETV (Y181C). No side effects were reported. Conclusions Our results suggest that ETV plus 2NRTI could be a good strategy for simplification in virologically suppressed patients despite previous episodes of VF if the GSS to the new regimen is ≥1.5 and ETV remains active. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]