부산대학교 도서관

Objectives: To assess performance of new, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES), in patients with long coronary lesions (LL) and to compare it to permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES).Background: LL have been associated with worse clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The impact of lesion length on the outcomes of drug eluting stent (DES) implantations is not as clear.Methods: In the frame of a randomized, multicentre CENTURY II study, out of 1119 patients enrolled, 182 patients had LL (defined as ≥25 mm), and were assigned randomly to treatment with BP-SES (101) or PP-EES (81). Primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF, composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TLR]) at 9 months. All data were 100% monitored and adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee.Results: The baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 study arms. At 9-months, the rates of cardiac death (2.0% vs 1.2%; P = 0.70), MI (3.0% vs 4.9%; P = 0.49) and clinically driven TLR (2.0% vs 3.7%; P = 0.48) and TLF (6.9% vs 8.6%; P = 0.67) were similar for BP-SES and PP-EES, respectively. There was no stent thrombosis (ST) in BP-SES group up to 9 months, while 1 case (1.2%) of ST was recorded in PP-EES group (P = 0.44).Conclusions: Patients with LL showed similar clinical outcomes when treated with Ultimaster BP-SES and Xience PP-EES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]