Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of communication via the standard Da Vinci Si speaker system with a wireless, hands-free audio system in a prospective blinded study.Methods: Nine hundred and sixty surgical phrases were spoken in a simulated robotic operating room (OR), including 480 phrases expressed via the Da Vinci Si speakers and 480 phrases expressed through a wireless, hands-free system. Using a dual console robotic system, communication was evaluated. Wireless headsets were given to the console and assistant robotic console surgeons, bedside assistant, anesthesiologist, and circulating nurse. An accurate response was defined as hearing the phrase correctly and transcribing it on a data sheet. The primary outcome was the number of correct phrases recorded during the study and secondary outcomes included subjective clarity and effectiveness of communication reported using a Likert scale.Results: Overall, the wireless, hands-free system increased the accuracy of communication (390/480 [81.3%]) compared to the conventional robotic system (310/480 [64.4%]; P <.001). The bedside assistant, anesthesiologist, and circulating nurse had significantly fewer correct phrases recorded than the assistant robotic console surgeon when using the robotic speakers (P <.05 for all). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the number of correct phrases recorded between different positions when using the wireless system. Subjectively, the wireless system resulted in improved clarity and effectiveness of communication (P = .021; P <.001, respectively).Conclusion: Robotic operating systems have intrinsic barriers to effective communication between the surgeon and the rest of the operating room team. Improved communication could reduce surgical errors and improve patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]