부산대학교 도서관

Improving the reliability of quantification in lipidomic analyses is crucial for its successful application in the discovery of new biomarkers or in clinical practice. In this study, we propose a workflow to improve the accuracy and precision of lipidomic results issued by the laboratory. Lipid species from 11 classes were analyzed by a targeted RPLC-MRM/MS method. The peak areas of species were used to estimate concentrations by an internal standard calibration approach (IS-calibration) and by an alternative normalization signal calibration schema (NS-calibration). The latter uses a long-term reference plasma material as a matrix-matched external calibrator whose accuracy was compared to the NIST SRM-1950 mean consensus values reported by the Interlaboratory Lipidomics Comparison Exercise. The bias of lipid concentrations showed a good accuracy for 69 of 89 quantified lipids. The quantitation of species by the NS-calibration schema improved the within- and between-batch reproducibility in quality control samples, in comparison to the usual IS-calibration approach. Moreover, the NS-calibration workflow improved the robustness of the lipidomics measurements reducing the between-batch variability (relative standard deviation <10% for 95% of lipid species) in real conditions tested throughout the analysis of 120 plasma samples. In addition, we provide a free access web tool to obtain the concentration of lipid species by the two previously mentioned quantitative approaches, providing an easy follow-up of quality control tasks related to lipidomics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]