부산대학교 도서관

Background: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during benign gynaecologic surgery is advocated as a risk‐reducing strategy due to the inverse association of epithelial ovarian cancers observed in epidemiological studies in a low‐risk setting. Currently, no formal guidance exists for permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section in Australia. Aims: Our aim was to survey Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) regarding bilateral salpingectomy compared to other procedures offered for permanent contraception at the time of caesarean section. Materials and Methods: An online survey was utilised to collect clinician demographics, opinions, barriers, and justifications in regard to options of permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section. Results: Bilateral salpingectomy was identified as the most effective method of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section. However, only 62% of respondents offer the procedure as a method of permanent contraception. The two most common reasons for clinicians to offer bilateral salpingectomy at time of caesarean section were evidence suggesting a link between the fallopian tube and gynaecological cancer (80%) and efficacy as a permanent form of contraception (16%). The primary barrier identified by 51% of respondents was perceived increased risk of surgical complications, followed by reasoning that it would not allow the possibility of future tubal reversal. Conclusion: This study identifies diverse opinions on surgical approach to permanent contraception at time of caesarean section and offered by clinicians of RANZCOG. Further research is required to establish safety profiles and short‐ and long‐term risks of bilateral salpingectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]