학술논문
Shifting the Male Gaze of Evidence.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*SEX discrimination
*DECISION making in law
*REASON
*RULES
FEDERAL Rules of Evidence (U.S.)
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
0042-2533
Abstract
The article critiques the pursuit of objective rationality in the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). It challenges the dichotomy between rationality and emotion, exposing how it perpetuates gender biases. It calls for a more nuanced understanding of emotions in decision-making, advocating for updates to the rules that align with modern science and a less gendered perspective.