학술논문

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia.
Document Type
Article
Source
PLoS ONE. 10/18/2019, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p1-11. 11p.
Subject
*ANTHRAX
*CASE-control method
*ANIMAL mortality
*KNOWLEDGE gap theory
*ODDS ratio
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
Language
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Anthrax is endemic in Georgia and recent outbreaks prompted a livestock-handler case-control study with a component to evaluate anthrax knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among livestock handlers or owners. Cases were handlers of livestock with confirmed animal anthrax from June 2013-May 2015. Handlers of four matched unaffected animals were selected as controls, two from the same village as the case animal ("village control") and two from 3–10 km away ("area control"). Descriptive statistics were reported and conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the magnitude of the association of cases with specific study KAP factors. Cases were more likely male, had lower level college education, less animal care experience, and provided more animal care to their cattle. Cases had lower odds of burying a suddenly dead animal compared to all controls (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.12, 0.88) and area controls (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.91). On an 8-point knowledge scale, cases having an animal with anthrax had a 1.31 times greater knowledge score compared to all controls (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67). Cases had higher odds of ever having human anthrax or knowing another person who had anthrax compared to all controls (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 1.45, 14.30) and area controls (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.52, 33.80). Cases were more knowledgeable of anthrax and had better anthrax prevention practices, but these are likely a result of the case investigation and ring vaccination following the death of their animal. The findings reveal a low level of knowledge and practices related to anthrax control and prevention, and will guide educational material development to fill these gaps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]