부산대학교 도서관

This study investigates the best approach to calibrate an event-based conceptual Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model, comparing different trials of single-objective, single-event multi-objective (SEMO), and multi-event-multi-objective (MEMO) model calibrations using root mean squared error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE), and Bias as objective functions. Model performance was validated for several peak events via 90% confidence interval (CI)-based output uncertainty quantification of relative error of discharges. Multi-objective optimization yielded more accurate and robust solutions compared to single-objective calibrations. Ensembles of Pareto solutions from the multi-objective calibrations better characterized the flood peaks within the uncertainty intervals. MEMO calibration exhibited lower uncertainties and better prediction of peak events versus SEMO calibration. Moreover, the MEMO_6D (six-dimensional) approach outperformed the SEMO_3D and MEMO_3D in capturing the larger peak events. This study suggests that the MEMO_6D is the best approach for predicting large flood events with lower model output uncertainties when the calibration is performed with a better combination of peak events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]