부산대학교 도서관

Endoscopy reports by gastroenterologists describing rectosigmoid tumors often are missing crucial data for surgical planning, leading to high rates of repeat exams before surgical decision-making. We hypothesize that there will be significant deficiencies in the endoscopic reporting of rectosigmoid lesions leading to high rates of repeat endoscopic examination at our institution. Retrospective review from January 2016 to November 2019 included 188 patients with rectosigmoid lesions referred for surgery with an outside endoscopy report. Three criteria were abstracted from these reports or included pictures: (1) distance from the tumor to an anatomical landmark (anal verge, dentate line, sphincter), (2) Tattoo placement (if performed) and location, and (3) tumor relationship to the valves of Houston. Reports were classified exemplary, nearly adequate, or inadequate if 3, 2, and ≤ 1 of these criteria were met, respectively. Distance was reported in 38.8% (n = 73) of reports, with the anal verge being the most commonly reported anatomical landmark (32.4%, n = 61 reports). Tattoo was placed in 34.6% (n = 65), though only 21.8% (n = 41) described the location of the tattoo relative to the tumor. Relationship to the valves of Houston was seen in 29.2% (n = 55) of reports. Only 5.3% (n = 10) of outside endoscopy reports were graded as exemplary, 20.2% (n = 38) nearly adequate, and the remaining 74.5% (n = 140) inadequate. A total of 87.5% (n = 165) of patients required repeat endoscopy with a significantly higher proportion from the inadequate group. Many referring endoscopy reports contain inadequate information for the surgical planning of rectosigmoid tumor resection. Efforts to improve documentation (particularly about distance and location within the rectum) must be undertaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]