학술논문

Cryoablation of atrial fibrillation in "very severe" obese patients (BMI ≥ 40): Indications, feasibility, procedural safety and efficacy, and clinical outcome (the ICE‐Obese Extreme).
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Jul2024, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p1412-1421. 10p.
Subject
*REFERENCE values
*PATIENT safety
*SURGERY
*PATIENTS
*T-test (Statistics)
*BODY mass index
*PILOT projects
*FISHER exact test
*CRYOSURGERY
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*MANN Whitney U Test
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*CHI-squared test
*MULTIVARIATE analysis
*KAPLAN-Meier estimator
*ATRIAL fibrillation
*MORBID obesity
*COMPARATIVE studies
*DATA analysis software
*PROPORTIONAL hazards models
*REGRESSION analysis
*DISEASE complications
Language
ISSN
1045-3873
Abstract
Background: Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in very severe obese patients is challenging. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) represents an effective rhythm control strategy. However, data in this patient group were limited. Methods: Highly symptomatic AF patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 who had failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy and electrocardioversion and failure to achieve targeted body‐weight‐reduction underwent CBA. Results: Data of 72 very severe obese AF patients (Group A) and 129 AF patients with normal BMI (Group B, BMI < 25 kg/m2) were consecutively collected. Group A had significantly younger age (60.6 ± 10.4 vs. 69.2 ± 11.2 years), higher BMI (44.3 ± 4.3 vs. 22.5 ± 1.6 kg/m2). Procedural pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was successful in all patients (2 touch‐up ablation in Group A). Compared to Group B, Group A had similar procedural (61.3 ± 22.6 vs. 57.5 ± 19 min), similar fluoroscopy time (10.1 ± 5.5 vs. 9.2 ± 4.8 min) but significantly higher radiation dose (2852 ± 2095 vs. 884 ± 732 µGym2). We observed similar rates of real‐time‐isolation (78.6% vs. 78.5%), single‐shot‐isolation (86.5% vs. 88.8%), but significantly longer time‐to‐sustained‐isolation (53.5 ± 33 vs. 43.2 ± 25 s). There was significantly higher rate of puncture‐site‐complication (6.9% vs. 1.6%) in Group A. One‐year clinical success in paroxysmal AF was (Group A: 69.4% vs. Group B: 80.2%; p <.001), in persistent AF was (Group A: 58.1% vs. Group B: 62.8%; p =.889). In Re‐Do procedures Group A had a numerically lower PVI durability (75.0% vs. 83.6%, p =.089). Conclusion: For very severe obese AF patients, CBA appears feasible, leads to relatively good clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]