학술논문

Effect of methenamine hippurate shortage on antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections in Norway—an interrupted time series analysis.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC). May2024, Vol. 79 Issue 5, p1109-1117. 9p.
Subject
*URINARY tract infections
*TIME series analysis
*METHENAMINE
*DRUG prescribing
*ANTIBIOTIC residues
*RESPIRATORY infections
Language
ISSN
0305-7453
Abstract
Background Despite a lack of conclusive evidence of effect, methenamine hippurate is widely prescribed as preventive treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Norway. A national discontinuation of methenamine hippurate treatment due to a 4-month drug shortage in 2019 presented an opportunity to evaluate its preventive effect on UTIs among regular users. Objective To estimate the impact of the methenamine hippurate drug shortage on prescription frequency of UTI antibiotics. Methods Data from The Norwegian Prescription Database was analysed using an interrupted time series design. The time series consisted of 56 time periods of 14 days. The model included two naturally occurring interruptions: (i) the methenamine hippurate drug shortage, and (ii) reintroduction of the drug. The study population were 18 345 women ≥50 years receiving ≥2 prescriptions of methenamine hippurate in the study period before the shortage. Main outcome measure was number of prescriptions of UTI antibiotics per 1000 methenamine hippurate users. Prescription rates of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections were analysed to assess external events affecting antibiotic prescribing patterns. Results We found a significant increase of 2.41 prescriptions per 1000 methenamine hippurate users per 14-day period during the drug shortage (95%CI 1.39, 3.43, P  < 0.001), followed by a significant reduction of −2.64 prescriptions after reintroduction (95%CI −3.66, −1.63, P  < 0.001). Conclusions During the methenamine hippurate drug shortage, we found a significant increase in prescribing trend for UTI antibiotics followed by a significant decrease in prescribing trend after reintroduction. This change in trend seems to reflect a preventive effect of the drug on recurrent UTIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]