학술논문

Examining interprofessional team interventions designed to improve nursing and team outcomes in practice: a descriptive and methodological review.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2018, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p719-727. 9p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts.
Subject
*CINAHL database
*CLINICAL competence
*COMMUNICATION
*HEALTH care teams
*MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems
*PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems
*RESEARCH methodology
*EVALUATION of medical care
*MEDLINE
*META-analysis
*NURSING
*NURSING practice
*ONLINE information services
*HEALTH outcome assessment
*PROFESSIONAL peer review
*SENSORY perception
*QUALITY assurance
*TEAMS in the workplace
*SYSTEMATIC reviews
Language
ISSN
1356-1820
Abstract
Effective interprofessional (IP) team-based care is critical to enhance the delivery of efficient care and improve nursing and IP team outcomes. This study aims to review the most recent IP team intervention studies that focused on outcomes related to nursing and IP teams. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched for existing literature published between January 2011 and December 2016. The search strategy was developed through both literature review and consultation with a health sciences librarian. This review included IP team intervention studies published in peer-reviewed journals and written in English. Studies were included if they conducted an IP team intervention for healthcare teams that include nurses and examined outcomes related to nursing and the IP teams. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 41 articles were included for the final review. Two authors extracted data on the characteristics of IP team interventions, assessment methods, and their outcomes related to nursing and IP teams using a data abstraction tool developed by the research team. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We found that most of the included studies were conducted in the US and on inpatient units. A quasi-experimental study design was most commonly employed. Most studies conducted IP team training such as TeamSTEPPS® as a one-time activity. The most common outcomes measured were attitudes or perceptions about IP teamwork or communication, followed by patient-related outcomes, and knowledge or skills about IP competencies. The quality of the included studies was generally low. The findings from this review will contribute to understanding the characteristics of current IP intervention studies and call for IP scholars to design more rigorous yet realistic IP intervention studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]