학술논문

Prevalence and clinical associations of ultrasound-confirmed enthesitis in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Document Type
Article
Source
Rheumatology. Nov2023, Vol. 62 Issue 11, p3619-3626. 8p.
Subject
*TENDON injuries
*ACADEMIC medical centers
*SERODIAGNOSIS
*SEROLOGY
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*MANN Whitney U Test
*FISHER exact test
*RISK assessment
*COMPARATIVE studies
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*SYSTEMIC lupus erythematosus
*DATA analysis software
*ARTHRITIS
*LONGITUDINAL method
*DISEASE risk factors
*DISEASE complications
*SYMPTOMS
Language
ISSN
1462-0324
Abstract
Objectives To assess the prevalence of US-confirmed enthesitis in a cohort of patients with SLE and to analyse the clinical associations to enthesitis during the course of SLE. Methods In a retrospective analysis of the SLE cohort of the Lupus Unit of the Careggi University Hospital, US examinations of SLE patients presenting with tender and/or swollen joints were retrieved to assess the presence of enthesitis. Patients with US-proven enthesitis were compared with SLE controls with tender and/or swollen joints who showed no US evidence of enthesitis. Clinical and laboratory features were compared at disease onset and during follow-up. Results A total of 400 patients fulfilling EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE were assessed. Of these, 106 underwent articular US examination. Evidence of enthesitis was found in 31/106 (29.2%) patients. Seventy-one patients without US-enthesitis were included as controls; four were excluded due to lack of follow-up data. Laboratory and clinical features were comparable between cases and controls at disease onset. Throughout a median follow-up of 10.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.3–23.3) years for cases and 12.4 (IQR 7.2–13.3) years for controls, patients with enthesitis were less likely to develop renal involvement (22.6% vs 46.5%, P  = 0.028) and failed B cell depletion more frequently (75.0% vs 0%). Conclusion In SLE patients with clinically active joints, US-proven enthesitis is a fairly common finding. Enthesitis in SLE could be the hallmark of a distinct disease phenotype with less renal involvement, more arthritis and low response to anti-CD 20 therapy, potentially requiring a tailored treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]