부산대학교 도서관

Background: Although several studies have characterized the risk of coinfection in COVID pneumonia, the risk of the bloodstream and respiratory coinfection in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supports severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is poorly understood. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with COVID‐19 ARDS on ECMO at a single center between January 2020 and December 2021. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: Of 44 patients placed on ECMO support for COVID‐19 ARDS, 30 (68.2%) patients developed a coinfection, and 14 (31.8%) patients did not. Most patients underwent venovenous ECMO (98%; 43/44) cannulation in the right internal jugular vein (98%; 43/44). Patients with coinfection had a longer duration of ECMO (34 [interquartile range, IQR: 19.5, 65] vs. 15.5 [IQR 11, 27.3] days; p =.02), intensive care unit (ICU; 44 [IQR: 27,75.5] vs 31 [IQR 20–39.5] days; p =.03), and hospital (56.5 [IQR 27,75.5] vs 37.5 [IQR: 20.5–43.3]; p =.02) length of stay. When stratified by the presence of a coinfection, there was no difference in hospital mortality (37% vs. 29%; p =.46) or Kaplan–Meier survival (logrank p =.82). Time from ECMO to first positive blood and respiratory culture were 12 [IQR: 3, 28] and 10 [IQR: 1, 15] days, respectively. Freedom from any coinfection was 50 (95% confidence interval: 37.2–67.2)% at 15 days from ECMO initiation. Conclusions: There is a high rate of co‐infections in patients placed on ECMO for COVID‐19 ARDS. Although patients with coinfections had a longer duration of extracorporeal life support, and longer length of stays in the ICU and hospital, survival was not inferior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]