학술논문

Early modified primary closure for treatment of cardiac implantable electronic device pocket infections.
Document Type
Article
Source
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology. May2021, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p765-772. 8p.
Subject
*LENGTH of stay in hospitals
*INTRAVENOUS therapy
*IMPLANTABLE cardioverter-defibrillators
*POSTOPERATIVE care
*INFECTION
*NEGATIVE-pressure wound therapy
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*SURGICAL site
*POSTOPERATIVE period
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*PROSTHETIC heart valves
*HEPARIN
*COMPLICATIONS of prosthesis
Language
ISSN
0147-8389
Abstract
Background: Guidance for wound management of the vacated generator pocket in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pocket infections after removal of all hardware and tissue debridement is limited. The typical surgical technique for management of a purulent wound is to allow healing by secondary intention. An alternative approach uses negative pressure wound therapy with or without delayed primary closure. While effective in managing infection, these approaches increase hospital length of stay and costs. We present our experience with a third option: modified early primary wound closure over a suction device. Methods: All patients with CIED pocket infections who presented to our institution between September 2018 and October 2020 underwent extraction of hardware and modified primary wound closure over a negative pressure Jackson–Pratt drain. Length of hospital and postoperative stay, complications, and recurrent infections were recorded. Results: During the study period, 14 patients underwent modified primary wound closure for CIED pocket infections. Mean length of hospital stay was 6.64 days ± 4.01 days (standard deviation [SD]). Mean postoperative length of stay was 3.92 ± 2.21 days (SD). Two patients (both on intravenous heparin for mechanical valve prostheses) required re‐exploration for bleeding. No patients developed recurrent infection at a mean follow up of 363 ± 245 days (SD). Conclusion: Based on our experience, early modified primary wound closure for CIED pocket infections appears to be safe and allows for prompt discharge with no observed re‐infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]