학술논문

Racial Differences in the Association Between Self-Rated Health Status and Objective Clinical Measures Among Participants in the BARI 2D Trial.
Document Type
Article
Source
American Journal of Public Health. Apr2010 Supplement, Vol. 100 Issue S1, pS269-S276. 8p. 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject
*CLINICAL trials
*HEALTH & race
*TYPE 2 diabetes
*CORONARY disease
*WHITE people
*HEALTH of Black people
*SELF-evaluation
*PATIENTS
*HEALTH
Language
ISSN
0090-0036
Abstract
Objectives. We explored whether and how race shapes perceived health status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Methods. We analyzed self-rated health (fair or poor versus good, verygood, or excellent) and associated clinical risk factors among 866 White and 333 Black participants in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial. Results. Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument scores, regular exercise, and employment were associated with higher self-rated health (P>.05). Blacks were more likely than were Whites to rate their health as fair or poor (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.88; 95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.38, 2.57; P>.001). Among Whites but not Blacks, a clinical history of myocardial infarction (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.12, 2.31; P>.001) and insulin use (OR= 1.62; 95% CI = 1.10, 2.38; P=.01) was associated with a fair or poor rating. A post-high school education was related to poorer self-rated health among Blacks (OR = 1.86; 95% Cl = 1.07, 3.24; P>.001). Conclusions. Symptomatic clinical factors played a proportionally larger role in self-assessment of health among Whites with diabetes and coronary artery disease than among Blacks with the same conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]