학술논문

Life events and treatment prognosis for depression: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Affective Disorders. Feb2022, Vol. 299, p298-308. 11p.
Subject
*LIFE change events
*PROGNOSIS
*VIOLENT crimes
*DEPRESSED persons
*SOCIAL support
Language
ISSN
0165-0327
Abstract
• Depressed patients reporting severely stressful life events had worse prognoses. • Reporting three or more events was associated with considerably worse outcomes. • This held in patients with long durations and those in a first depressive episode. • Effects were attenuated by variables that might have been affected by the events. • Clinicians should routinely ask patients about life events and assess their impact. To investigate associations between major life events and prognosis independent of treatment type: (1) after adjusting for clinical prognostic factors and socio-demographics; (2) amongst patients with depressive episodes at least six-months long; and (3) patients with a first life-time depressive episode. Six RCTs of adults seeking treatment for depression in primary care met eligibility criteria, individual patient data (IPD) were collated from all six (n = 2858). Participants were randomized to any treatment and completed the same baseline assessment of life events, demographics and clinical prognostic factors. Two-stage random effects meta-analyses were conducted. Reporting any major life events was associated with poorer prognosis regardless of treatment type. Controlling for baseline clinical factors, socio-demographics and social support resulted in minimal residual evidence of associations between life events and treatment prognosis. However, removing factors that might mediate the relationships between life events and outcomes reporting: arguments/disputes, problem debt, violent crime, losing one's job, and three or more life events were associated with considerably worse prognoses (percentage difference in 3–4 months depressive symptoms compared to no reported life events =30.3%(95%CI: 18.4–43.3)). Assessing for clinical prognostic factors, social support, and socio-demographics is likely to be more informative for prognosis than assessing self-reported recent major life events. However, clinicians might find it useful to ask about such events, and if they are still affecting the patient, consider interventions to tackle problems related to those events (e.g. employment support, mediation, or debt advice). Further investigations of the efficacy of such interventions will be important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]