학술논문

Chronic Pain Features Relate to Quality of Life More than Physiopathology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation in Pain Clinics.
Document Type
Article
Source
Pain Practice. Sep2017, Vol. 17 Issue 7, p866-878. 13p. 3 Diagrams, 3 Charts.
Subject
*QUALITY of life
*SLEEP
*ADAPTABILITY (Personality)
*ANXIETY
*CHRONIC pain
*COMPARATIVE studies
*MULTIVARIATE analysis
*PSYCHOLOGICAL tests
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*ACTIVITIES of daily living
*CROSS-sectional method
*NOCICEPTIVE pain
*BRIEF Pain Inventory
*DISEASE complications
Language
ISSN
1530-7085
Abstract
Objective To compare the impact of chronic pain physiopathology on health-related quality of life ( HR-QoL), considering the influence of pain features and psychosocial adjustment (intensity, interference, psychological comorbidities, and sleep quality). Design A cross-sectional study involving 1,025 noncancer patients with predominantly neuropathic, nociceptive, or mixed chronic pain conditions was conducted in 88 pain clinics within Spain. The EuroQol-5 Dimensions instrument ( EQ-5D) was used to measure HR-QoL. The Brief Pain Inventory ( BPI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( HADS), and sleep scale developed for the MOS study ( MOS- SQ) were used to measure pain features and psychosocial adjustment. Multivariate analyses were used to model HR-QoL measures. Results All patients reported very low HR-QoL. The mean EQ-5D index scores were 0.33, 0.36, and 0.37 in the mixed, neuropathic, and nociceptive pain groups, respectively. The differences did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.057). Patients with nociceptive pain had less pain (least pain intensity score: 4.7 vs. 5.2 in the other groups; P = 0.006), less interference with daily activities ( BPI average interference score: 6.3 vs. 6.6 and 6.7 in the neuropathic and mixed pain groups, respectively; P = 0.013), less anxiety ( HADS score: 8.5 vs. 9.6 and 9.7 in the same respective groups; P = 0.001), and fewer sleep problems ( MOS- SQ sleep problems index: 46.8 vs. 52.2 and 50.2 in the same respective groups; P = 0.005). In the adjusted analyses, HR-QoL measures were explained by pain intensity, anxiety, and sleep quality, but not by physiopathological pain type. Conclusions Pain features, particularly intensity, have a greater impact than pain physiopathology on HR-QoL. Distinct physiopathological mechanisms give rise to different pain features that, in turn, may mediate the HR-QoL of patients with chronic pain. This could be used to improve pain management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]