학술논문

Sex does not influence the long‐term outcome of matrix‐assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation.
Document Type
Article
Source
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. Feb2024, p1. 12p. 6 Illustrations, 2 Charts.
Subject
Language
ISSN
0942-2056
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Level of Evidence Regenerative techniques for articular cartilage lesions demonstrated heterogeneous clinical results. Several factors may influence the outcome, with sex being one of the most debated. This study aimed at quantifying the long‐term influence of sex on the clinical outcome obtained with a regenerative procedure for knee chondral lesions.Matrix‐assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) was used to treat 235 knees which were prospectively evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), EuroQol visual analogue scale, and Tegner scores at 14‐year mean follow‐up. A multilevel analysis was performed with the IKDC subjective scores standardised according to the age/sex category of each patient and/or the selection of a match‐paired subgroup to compare homogeneous men and women patients.At 14 years, men and women showed a failure rate of 10.7% and 28.8%, respectively (p < 0.0005). An overall improvement was observed in both sexes. Women had more patellar lesions and men more condylar lesions (p = 0.001), and the latter also presented a higher preinjury activity level (p < 0.0005). Men had significantly higher IKDC subjective scores at all follow‐ups (at 14 years: 77.2 ± 18.9 vs. 62.8 ± 23.1; p < 0.0005). However, the analysis of homogeneous match‐paired populations of men and women, with standardised IKDC subjective scores, showed no differences between men and women (at 14 years: −1.6 ± 1.7 vs. −1.9 ± 1.6).Men and women treated with MACT for knee chondral lesions presented a significant improvement and stable long‐term results. When both sexes are compared with homogeneous match‐paired groups, they have similar results over time. However, women present more often unfavourable lesion patterns, which proved more challenging in terms of long‐term outcome after MACT.Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]