소장자료
LDR | 02874cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
001 | 0093777927▲ | ||
005 | 20180520083957▲ | ||
008 | 161031s2016 enk b 001 0 eng c▲ | ||
010 | ▼a2016933490▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9780199688227 (hbk.)▲ | ||
020 | ▼a0199688222 (hbk.)▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(KERIS)REF000018433586▲ | ||
040 | ▼aYDX▼beng▼cYDX▼dZCU▼dOCLCO▼dGZN▼dLML▼dUAB▼dHTM▼dVLB▼dTFW▼dCUT▼dOCLCA▼d221016▲ | ||
050 | 4 | ▼aB823▼b.R87 2016▲ | |
082 | 0 | 4 | ▼a141▼223▲ |
090 | ▼a141▼bR952i▲ | ||
100 | 1 | ▼aRush, Fred.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aIrony and idealism :▼brereading Schlegel, Hegel and Kierkegaard /▼cFred Rush.▲ |
246 | 1 | 8 | ▼aIrony & idealism▲ |
250 | ▼a1st ed.▲ | ||
260 | ▼aOxford :▼bOxford University Press,▼c2016.▲ | ||
300 | ▼axiv, 312 p. ;▼c24 cm.▲ | ||
504 | ▼aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 295-308) and index.▲ | ||
505 | 0 | ▼aJena romanticism and the philosophical significance of irony -- Irony displaced, or Hegel -- Irony redivivus, or Kierkegaard.▲ | |
520 | ▼a"Irony and Idealism investigates the historical and conceptual structure of the development of a philosophically distinctive conception of irony in early- to mid-nineteenth century European philosophy. The principal figures treated are the romantic thinkers Friedrich Schlegel and Novalis, Hegel, and Kierkegaard. Fred Rush argues that the development of philosophical irony in this historical period is best understood as providing a way forward in philosophy in the wake of Kant and Jacobi that is discrete from, and many times opposed to, German idealism. Irony and Idealism argues, against the grain of received opinion, that among the German romantics Schlegel's conception of irony is superior to similar ideas found in Novalis. It also presents a sustained argument showing that historical reconsideration of Schlegel has been hampered by contestable Hegelian assumptions concerning the conceptual viability of romantic irony and by the misinterpretation of what the romantics mean by 'the absolute.' Rush argues that this is primarily a social-ontological term and not, as is often supposed, a metaphysical concept. Kierkegaard, although critical of the romantic conception, deploys his own adaptation of it in his criticism of Hegel, continuing, and in a way completing, the arc of irony through nineteenth-century philosophy. The book concludes by offering suggestions meant to guide contemporary reconsideration of Schlegel's and Kierkegaard's views on the philosophical significance of irony."--Provided by publisher.▲ | ||
600 | 1 | 0 | ▼aSchlegel, Friedrich von,▼d1772-1829▼xCriticism and interpretation.▲ |
600 | 1 | 0 | ▼aHegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich,▼d1770-1831▼xCriticism and interpretation.▲ |
600 | 0 | 0 | ▼aNovalis,▼d1772-1801▼xCriticism and interpretation.▲ |
600 | 1 | 0 | ▼aKierkegaard, Søren,▼d1813-1855▼xCriticism and interpretation.▲ |
650 | 0 | ▼aIdealism▼xPhilosophy.▲ | |
999 | ▼a정재훈▼c김미선▲ |

Irony and idealism :rereading Schlegel, Hegel and Kierkegaard
자료유형
국외단행본
서명/책임사항
Irony and idealism : rereading Schlegel, Hegel and Kierkegaard / Fred Rush.
책등서명
Irony & idealism
개인저자
판사항
1st ed.
발행사항
Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2016.
형태사항
xiv, 312 p. ; 24 cm.
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (p. 295-308) and index.
내용주기
Jena romanticism and the philosophical significance of irony -- Irony displaced, or Hegel -- Irony redivivus, or Kierkegaard.
요약주기
"Irony and Idealism investigates the historical and conceptual structure of the development of a philosophically distinctive conception of irony in early- to mid-nineteenth century European philosophy. The principal figures treated are the romantic thinkers Friedrich Schlegel and Novalis, Hegel, and Kierkegaard. Fred Rush argues that the development of philosophical irony in this historical period is best understood as providing a way forward in philosophy in the wake of Kant and Jacobi that is discrete from, and many times opposed to, German idealism. Irony and Idealism argues, against the grain of received opinion, that among the German romantics Schlegel's conception of irony is superior to similar ideas found in Novalis. It also presents a sustained argument showing that historical reconsideration of Schlegel has been hampered by contestable Hegelian assumptions concerning the conceptual viability of romantic irony and by the misinterpretation of what the romantics mean by 'the absolute.' Rush argues that this is primarily a social-ontological term and not, as is often supposed, a metaphysical concept. Kierkegaard, although critical of the romantic conception, deploys his own adaptation of it in his criticism of Hegel, continuing, and in a way completing, the arc of irony through nineteenth-century philosophy. The book concludes by offering suggestions meant to guide contemporary reconsideration of Schlegel's and Kierkegaard's views on the philosophical significance of irony."--Provided by publisher.
주제
ISBN
9780199688227 (hbk.) 0199688222 (hbk.)
청구기호
141 R952i
소장정보
예도서예약
서서가에없는책 신고
보보존서고신청
캠캠퍼스대출
우우선정리신청
배자료배달신청
문문자발송
출청구기호출력
학소장학술지 원문서비스
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 서비스 |
---|
북토크
자유롭게 책을 읽고
느낀점을 적어주세요
글쓰기
느낀점을 적어주세요
청구기호 브라우징
관련 인기대출 도서