소장자료
LDR | 05368nam 2200505 4500 | ||
001 | 0100871633▲ | ||
005 | 20250523105330▲ | ||
006 | m o d ▲ | ||
007 | cr#unu||||||||▲ | ||
008 | 250123s2024 us ||||||||||||||c||eng d▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9798382321455▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31140573▲ | ||
040 | ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ▼d221016▲ | ||
082 | 0 | ▼a610▲ | |
100 | 1 | ▼aPach, Jolanta J.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aDermatologic Infectious Complications and Mimickers in Cancer Patients on Oncologic Therapy▼h[electronic resource].▲ |
260 | ▼a[S.l.]: ▼bYale University. ▼c2024▲ | ||
260 | 1 | ▼aAnn Arbor : ▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2024▲ | |
300 | ▼a1 online resource(46 p.)▲ | ||
500 | ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.▲ | ||
500 | ▼aAdvisor: Leventhal, Jonathan S.;Nelson, Caroline A.▲ | ||
502 | 1 | ▼aThesis (M.D.)--Yale University, 2024.▲ | |
520 | ▼aDermatologic infections affecting the skin, hair, mucosae, and nails are common complications of systemic cancer therapy and can impact cancer patients' quality of life; however, studies investigating these complications are largely lacking. We aimed to characterize dermatologic infectious complications secondary to oncologic therapy and the management of these complications in the outpatient and inpatient settings. We sought to identify how dermatologic infections differ in patients undergoing novel classes of cancer therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, compared to those on traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Second, we aimed to investigate non-infectious dermatologic complications of oncologic therapy which may mimic infectious complications. Here, we present the results of retrospective chart reviews of the Yale New Haven Health electronic medical record on dermatologic infectious complications as well as non-infectious mimickers in cancer patients on systemic cancer treatment. Joint Data Analytics Team queries as well as manual chart review were used to identify patients seen in the outpatient oncodermatology clinic and inpatient consultative service with a cancer diagnosis and a dermatologic infectious diagnosis or pseudocellulitis diagnosis. The majority of reported infections occurred in patients receiving regimens including cytotoxic therapy (67.4%). In comparison, fewer infections were reported in patients on targeted agents (27.2%) or immunotherapy (5.4%). We found that invasive bacterial infections, disseminated viral infections, invasive fungal infections, and atypical infections occurred most commonly in patients treated with regimens including cytotoxic therapy: of infections associated with cytotoxic therapy, 60.8% of bacterial infections and 6.8% of fungal infections were invasive, while 17.9% of viral infections were disseminated. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy were less often associated with severe soft tissue infections. Invasive or disseminated infections were also more likely to require inpatient management or impact cancer therapy. Therefore, there should be a low threshold for obtaining sterile tissue cultures for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial organisms in these patients to decrease the risk of life-threatening complications. Non-infectious dermatologic complications such as pseudocellulitis, on the other hand, may mimic infections. Distinguishing cellulitis from pseudocellulitis is important to minimize antibiotic usage and interruptions of cancer therapy for oncologic patients. We characterized dermatologic adverse effects of various cancer therapies that presented similarly to cellulitis and were often treated with antibiotics before consultation with dermatology. Acute lipodermatosclerosis was the most common condition presenting as pseudocellulitis (74.2%), associated with gemcitabine in 73.9% of cases. Other dermatologic diagnoses of pseudocellulitis included venous stasis dermatitis, injection site reaction/extravasation injury, and edema bullae, among others. 77.4% of patients received systemic antibiotics before referral to dermatology, emphasizing the difficulty of distinguishing it from true cellulitis and the decision to treat empirically with antibiotics in a high-risk population. 32.3% of patients experienced interruption of cancer therapy due to concern for cellulitis. After dermatologic consultation, pseudocellulitis was successfully treated with topical anti-inflammatory agents. Recognition of both infectious and non-infectious dermatologic complications of cancer therapy is essential for proper management and to minimize interruptions in life-preserving oncologic treatment.▲ | ||
590 | ▼aSchool code: 0265.▲ | ||
650 | 4 | ▼aMedicine.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aCellular biology.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aOncology.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aImmunology.▲ | |
653 | ▼aCancer therapy▲ | ||
653 | ▼aDermatologic toxicity▲ | ||
653 | ▼aDermatology▲ | ||
653 | ▼aOncodermatology▲ | ||
653 | ▼aSkin infections▲ | ||
653 | ▼aSoft tissue infections▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0564▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0379▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0992▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0982▲ | ||
710 | 2 | 0 | ▼aYale University.▼bYale School of Medicine.▲ |
773 | 0 | ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-11B.▲ | |
790 | ▼a0265▲ | ||
791 | ▼aM.D.▲ | ||
792 | ▼a2024▲ | ||
793 | ▼aEnglish▲ | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | ▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17160584▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.▲ |

Dermatologic Infectious Complications and Mimickers in Cancer Patients on Oncologic Therapy[electronic resource]
자료유형
국외단행본
서명/책임사항
Dermatologic Infectious Complications and Mimickers in Cancer Patients on Oncologic Therapy [electronic resource].
개인저자
발행사항
[S.l.] : Yale University. 2024 Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses , 2024
형태사항
1 online resource(46 p.)
일반주기
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
Advisor: Leventhal, Jonathan S.;Nelson, Caroline A.
Advisor: Leventhal, Jonathan S.;Nelson, Caroline A.
학위논문주기
Thesis (M.D.)--Yale University, 2024.
요약주기
Dermatologic infections affecting the skin, hair, mucosae, and nails are common complications of systemic cancer therapy and can impact cancer patients' quality of life; however, studies investigating these complications are largely lacking. We aimed to characterize dermatologic infectious complications secondary to oncologic therapy and the management of these complications in the outpatient and inpatient settings. We sought to identify how dermatologic infections differ in patients undergoing novel classes of cancer therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, compared to those on traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Second, we aimed to investigate non-infectious dermatologic complications of oncologic therapy which may mimic infectious complications. Here, we present the results of retrospective chart reviews of the Yale New Haven Health electronic medical record on dermatologic infectious complications as well as non-infectious mimickers in cancer patients on systemic cancer treatment. Joint Data Analytics Team queries as well as manual chart review were used to identify patients seen in the outpatient oncodermatology clinic and inpatient consultative service with a cancer diagnosis and a dermatologic infectious diagnosis or pseudocellulitis diagnosis. The majority of reported infections occurred in patients receiving regimens including cytotoxic therapy (67.4%). In comparison, fewer infections were reported in patients on targeted agents (27.2%) or immunotherapy (5.4%). We found that invasive bacterial infections, disseminated viral infections, invasive fungal infections, and atypical infections occurred most commonly in patients treated with regimens including cytotoxic therapy: of infections associated with cytotoxic therapy, 60.8% of bacterial infections and 6.8% of fungal infections were invasive, while 17.9% of viral infections were disseminated. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy were less often associated with severe soft tissue infections. Invasive or disseminated infections were also more likely to require inpatient management or impact cancer therapy. Therefore, there should be a low threshold for obtaining sterile tissue cultures for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial organisms in these patients to decrease the risk of life-threatening complications. Non-infectious dermatologic complications such as pseudocellulitis, on the other hand, may mimic infections. Distinguishing cellulitis from pseudocellulitis is important to minimize antibiotic usage and interruptions of cancer therapy for oncologic patients. We characterized dermatologic adverse effects of various cancer therapies that presented similarly to cellulitis and were often treated with antibiotics before consultation with dermatology. Acute lipodermatosclerosis was the most common condition presenting as pseudocellulitis (74.2%), associated with gemcitabine in 73.9% of cases. Other dermatologic diagnoses of pseudocellulitis included venous stasis dermatitis, injection site reaction/extravasation injury, and edema bullae, among others. 77.4% of patients received systemic antibiotics before referral to dermatology, emphasizing the difficulty of distinguishing it from true cellulitis and the decision to treat empirically with antibiotics in a high-risk population. 32.3% of patients experienced interruption of cancer therapy due to concern for cellulitis. After dermatologic consultation, pseudocellulitis was successfully treated with topical anti-inflammatory agents. Recognition of both infectious and non-infectious dermatologic complications of cancer therapy is essential for proper management and to minimize interruptions in life-preserving oncologic treatment.
주제
ISBN
9798382321455
원문 등 관련정보
소장정보
예도서예약
서서가에없는책 신고
보보존서고신청
캠캠퍼스대출
우우선정리신청
배자료배달신청
문문자발송
출청구기호출력
학소장학술지 원문서비스
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 서비스 |
---|
북토크
자유롭게 책을 읽고
느낀점을 적어주세요
글쓰기
느낀점을 적어주세요
청구기호 브라우징
관련 인기대출 도서