소장자료
| LDR | 03101nam 2200505 4500 | ||
| 001 | 0100801971▲ | ||
| 005 | 20240329135434▲ | ||
| 006 | m o d ▲ | ||
| 007 | cr#unu||||||||▲ | ||
| 008 | 240116s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d▲ | ||
| 020 | ▼a9798379926908▲ | ||
| 035 | ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30523936▲ | ||
| 040 | ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ▲ | ||
| 082 | 0 | ▼a320▲ | |
| 100 | 1 | ▼aEichinger, A. Matthew.▲ | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aFact, Fiction, or Fragile? The Globalization and Populism Hypothesis▼h[electronic resource]▲ |
| 260 | ▼a[S.l.]: ▼bUniversity of Minnesota. ▼c2023▲ | ||
| 260 | 1 | ▼aAnn Arbor : ▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023▲ | |
| 300 | ▼a1 online resource(139 p.)▲ | ||
| 500 | ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.▲ | ||
| 500 | ▼aAdvisor: Freeman, John;Creamer, Cosette.▲ | ||
| 502 | 1 | ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.▲ | |
| 506 | ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.▲ | ||
| 520 | ▼aI study whether being employed in a trade-disadvantaged industry affects the probability of voting for a populist or authoritarian political party. I specifically study this relationship just after the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008, when publics in rich democracies were aware of their economic weakness. Using survey data from the European Social Survey (ESS) after 2008, as well as product trade data from UN Comtrade between the 1990s and 2010s, I can measure whether a survey participant worked in an industry that had a long-run trade advantage, a long-run trade disadvantage, or was not traded. Using matching methods, I pair survey participants working in different types of industries but who are otherwise similar on continuous observable characteristics and otherwise equal on observable categorical characteristics. I find that, all-else equal, participation in a trade-disadvantaged industry (a) does not have statistically significant on voting for a populist party and (b) has a statistically significant but small effect on voting for an authoritarian party. These results are inconsistent with the recent literature on globalization and populism, which argues that personal exposure to globalization causes populism. I interpret this finding to mean that the appeal of populist and authoritarian parties is more about social and cultural concerns than about economic concerns.▲ | ||
| 590 | ▼aSchool code: 0130.▲ | ||
| 650 | 4 | ▼aPolitical science.▲ | |
| 650 | 4 | ▼aStatistics.▲ | |
| 653 | ▼aDecentralization▲ | ||
| 653 | ▼aFormal theory▲ | ||
| 653 | ▼aMatching methods▲ | ||
| 653 | ▼aNationalism▲ | ||
| 653 | ▼aPopulism▲ | ||
| 653 | ▼aVoting▲ | ||
| 690 | ▼a0615▲ | ||
| 690 | ▼a0501▲ | ||
| 690 | ▼a0463▲ | ||
| 710 | 2 | 0 | ▼aUniversity of Minnesota.▼bPolitical Science.▲ |
| 773 | 0 | ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-01B.▲ | |
| 773 | ▼tDissertation Abstract International▲ | ||
| 790 | ▼a0130▲ | ||
| 791 | ▼aPh.D.▲ | ||
| 792 | ▼a2023▲ | ||
| 793 | ▼aEnglish▲ | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | ▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16933035▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.▲ |
Fact, Fiction, or Fragile? The Globalization and Populism Hypothesis[electronic resource]
자료유형
국외eBook
서명/책임사항
Fact, Fiction, or Fragile? The Globalization and Populism Hypothesis [electronic resource]
발행사항
[S.l.] : University of Minnesota. 2023 Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses , 2023
형태사항
1 online resource(139 p.)
일반주기
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
Advisor: Freeman, John;Creamer, Cosette.
Advisor: Freeman, John;Creamer, Cosette.
학위논문주기
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.
요약주기
I study whether being employed in a trade-disadvantaged industry affects the probability of voting for a populist or authoritarian political party. I specifically study this relationship just after the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008, when publics in rich democracies were aware of their economic weakness. Using survey data from the European Social Survey (ESS) after 2008, as well as product trade data from UN Comtrade between the 1990s and 2010s, I can measure whether a survey participant worked in an industry that had a long-run trade advantage, a long-run trade disadvantage, or was not traded. Using matching methods, I pair survey participants working in different types of industries but who are otherwise similar on continuous observable characteristics and otherwise equal on observable categorical characteristics. I find that, all-else equal, participation in a trade-disadvantaged industry (a) does not have statistically significant on voting for a populist party and (b) has a statistically significant but small effect on voting for an authoritarian party. These results are inconsistent with the recent literature on globalization and populism, which argues that personal exposure to globalization causes populism. I interpret this finding to mean that the appeal of populist and authoritarian parties is more about social and cultural concerns than about economic concerns.
주제
ISBN
9798379926908
관련 인기대출 도서